<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does Your Passion Invigorate or Irritate?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caffeinatedcoder.com/does-your-passion-invigorate-or-irritate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caffeinatedcoder.com/does-your-passion-invigorate-or-irritate/</link>
	<description>A Grande, Triple Shot, Non-Fat Core Dump by Russell Ball</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Feb 2012 19:33:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Ball</title>
		<link>http://www.caffeinatedcoder.com/does-your-passion-invigorate-or-irritate/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 01:24:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caffeinatedcoder.com/does-your-passion-invigorate-or-irritate/#comment-324</guid>
		<description>@Troy: Yes, Excellent point. In some ways it is even worse with methodologies because there is often even less objective proof that something does or doesn&#039;t work. I remember getting several &quot;because that is the way you are supposed to do it in Agile&quot; answers to questions rather than a legitimate explanation of the rationale behind a practice. If you are passionately advocating a practice without even knowing why you are doing it, then you are definitely in it for the religious perks rather than for pragmatic reasons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Troy: Yes, Excellent point. In some ways it is even worse with methodologies because there is often even less objective proof that something does or doesn&#8217;t work. I remember getting several &#8220;because that is the way you are supposed to do it in Agile&#8221; answers to questions rather than a legitimate explanation of the rationale behind a practice. If you are passionately advocating a practice without even knowing why you are doing it, then you are definitely in it for the religious perks rather than for pragmatic reasons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Tuttle</title>
		<link>http://www.caffeinatedcoder.com/does-your-passion-invigorate-or-irritate/comment-page-1/#comment-323</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Tuttle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 00:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caffeinatedcoder.com/does-your-passion-invigorate-or-irritate/#comment-323</guid>
		<description>@Russ:  Would you extend this to software development methodologies as well?  I see the same thing from folks adamantly for or against agile.  You have the &quot;Church of Agile&quot; and the &quot;RUP is the Only True Way&quot; folks who get in the way of rational examination of development approaches.  It seems to me, that zealotry really doesn&#039;t serve any useful purpose whether it&#039;s about the technology/tools or the latest methodology craze.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Russ:  Would you extend this to software development methodologies as well?  I see the same thing from folks adamantly for or against agile.  You have the &#8220;Church of Agile&#8221; and the &#8220;RUP is the Only True Way&#8221; folks who get in the way of rational examination of development approaches.  It seems to me, that zealotry really doesn&#8217;t serve any useful purpose whether it&#8217;s about the technology/tools or the latest methodology craze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Ball</title>
		<link>http://www.caffeinatedcoder.com/does-your-passion-invigorate-or-irritate/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Ball</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caffeinatedcoder.com/does-your-passion-invigorate-or-irritate/#comment-322</guid>
		<description>@Dewayne - Since this is .NET, I think we should go with something a little more low-brow like &quot;ALT.Lust&quot; or &quot;.NET sluts&quot;...:-)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;@Jeffrey - I agree that these types of personalities can be found in all technology camps and that being self-aware is usually enough to modify most people&#039;s behavior. But I&#039;ve also seen people who are aware of the affect they are having on people justify their obnoxious behavior by saying that they are just being passionate about what they do. That&#039;s why I think it is helpful to draw the distinction between good and bad types of enthusiams. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Dewayne &#8211; Since this is .NET, I think we should go with something a little more low-brow like &#8220;ALT.Lust&#8221; or &#8220;.NET sluts&#8221;&#8230;:-)</p>
<p>@Jeffrey &#8211; I agree that these types of personalities can be found in all technology camps and that being self-aware is usually enough to modify most people&#8217;s behavior. But I&#8217;ve also seen people who are aware of the affect they are having on people justify their obnoxious behavior by saying that they are just being passionate about what they do. That&#8217;s why I think it is helpful to draw the distinction between good and bad types of enthusiams.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeffrey Palermo</title>
		<link>http://www.caffeinatedcoder.com/does-your-passion-invigorate-or-irritate/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Palermo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:32:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caffeinatedcoder.com/does-your-passion-invigorate-or-irritate/#comment-321</guid>
		<description>I think I&#039;ve run into those types of people from every technology now.  I&#039;ve seen it from Java folks, .Net folks, Ruby folks, Delphi folks, PHP folks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Thank God they are still the minority and most people I run into are well-reasoned and professional about their craft.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I think it has more to do with their personality and being self-aware than it has to do with the technology.  When I say &quot;self-aware&quot;, I mean the ability to detect how they are affecting (annoying) people around them and the ability to alter behavior to improve their social situation.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I&#8217;ve run into those types of people from every technology now.  I&#8217;ve seen it from Java folks, .Net folks, Ruby folks, Delphi folks, PHP folks.</p>
<p>Thank God they are still the minority and most people I run into are well-reasoned and professional about their craft.</p>
<p>I think it has more to do with their personality and being self-aware than it has to do with the technology.  When I say &#8220;self-aware&#8221;, I mean the ability to detect how they are affecting (annoying) people around them and the ability to alter behavior to improve their social situation.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dewayne Christensen</title>
		<link>http://www.caffeinatedcoder.com/does-your-passion-invigorate-or-irritate/comment-page-1/#comment-320</link>
		<dc:creator>Dewayne Christensen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 14:17:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caffeinatedcoder.com/does-your-passion-invigorate-or-irritate/#comment-320</guid>
		<description>So, are you a Passion.Net developer? :)&lt;br /&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, are you a Passion.Net developer? <img src='http://www.caffeinatedcoder.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

